Comments [1] posted: Mar 15, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Back in the day, when life was hard, we had to mark up pages using notepad and we absolutely positively had to make them viewable within an 800 X 600 resolution. But you try and tell the kids that these days and they just won't believe a word you say.

Not a word...

So back in 2000 the broad screen resolution breakdown for web users looked something like this:


courtesy: www.thecounter.com

Therefore you as a web developer were incentivised to develop to the 800 X 600 resolution (I actually remember the discussion about moving up to 800 X 600 from 640 X 480).

Now-a-days it's much different:


courtesy: www.thecounter.com

It's just interesting now and again to revisit accelerating change.  Bottom line, if you are still basing your design on 800 X 600 you are not using the available screen real estate fully.

Update: and taking a look at my google analytics it is even more striking.

 


      Comments [1]
tags: [internet | statistics]


<<< Older Stuff Yo!

Go Vote for techRivet


The 2008 Weblog Awards
Just read down in the comments and click on the sign next to the techRivet entry.
The 2007 Weblog Awards



Total Posts: 544
This Year: 1
This Month: 1
This Week: 0
Comments: 219



Sign In
home | about | rss
heya punk.here is where lotsa content will be
Larry says!
Larry says!