Interesting article in the Wall Street Journal today that talks about an experienced regiment being replaced by a new regiment unfamiliar with the situation on the ground.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121634483343864311.html?mod=hpp_us_pageone (subscription required, sorry).
The interesting part of the article for me is how the army is using a wiki to store, update and disseminate information about the region they are working in.
Well that is exactly what they did.
The Army also offers the troops an online reference source, Wiki-Afghan. It looks just like Wikipedia, except it's all about Afghanistan and much of it is classified. There are upwards of 10,000 articles, and any authorized soldier can click on an entry and add new information.
That's just cool, although I wonder if it has the same problem that wikis everywhere have: the 90-10-1 rule. 90% of the people do nothing but read it, 10% (or less) contribute VERY minimally (once or twice) and 1% (or less) are your main contributors. The army deployed in Afghanistan may be of sufficient size that it can be a success.