Comments [0] posted: Jul 28, 2011 R. Lewis

Past experimental data have narrowed the range of possible masses for the elusive Higgs Boson to lie somewhere between 120 and 150 GeV. Scientists at Fermilab now believe they will have enough data to close this window completely by the end of September. Although it will take months to process the data, it should reveal with certainty if the Higgs Boson exists or not in the mass range where the standard model predicts it must exist. If the Higgs Boson is not found in this mass range, then certainly something must be wrong with the standard model. Other theories exist that could explain electroweak symmetry breaking, but if any of those theories were correct it would imply that the standard model is not correct. Either way the results will be exciting. The questions should be settled one way or another by the end of 2012.

But, will the Large Hadron Collider find the Higgs Boson, or disprove it's existence, before Fermilab? The LHC is currently on a technical stop, so they will not be able to collect any data before Fermilab collects the data they need to close the 120 - 150 GeV window. But it will still take months for Fermilab to crunch the numbers, and anything is possible in the meantime.

One way or another, 2012 is going to be an exciting year for particle physics.


      Comments [0]
tags: [atoms | LHC | physics]


Comments [1] posted: Aug 27, 2010 R. Lewis

Researchers at Stanford and Purdue universities seem to have discovered new physiscs.  The main discovery is that the rate of radioactive decay in some elements is not contant over time.  The theory is the variation is due to influence from neutrinos being emitted from the sun. 

Jere Jenkins, a nuclear engineer at Purdue, found the rate of decay of manganese-54 dropped suddenly one night.  Only later was it discovered that at that moment the sun had produced a massive solar flare.  Other observations have found that measurements of the rate of nuclear decay vary seasonally.  Other patterns show a 33 day cycle, which is the rate of rotation of the sun’s core.

This discovery is truly amazing.  Current theories suggest the neutrino does not interact with matter in this way.  If in fact the neutrino is interacting with atomic nuclei and influencing the rate of nuclear decay, than some new principal of physics must be involved. 

Although no theory has yet been put forward as to how this may work, or what new physics might explain the variation, the impact on modern science will be profound.  To begin with, basic assumptions about radioactive decay are used to date things.  If the rate of decay can change, the dates may also change, which could affect everything from paleontology to climate change.

Perhaps more astounding is the possibilities of applications of these new principals of physics.  Being able to manipulate the rate of radioactive decay might bring new kinds of nuclear reactors.  Perhaps a way to stop a nuclear meltdown by arresting the rate of nuclear decay in the fuel rods, or maybe even finding a way to make hydrogen fusion feasible.  Perhaps the transmutation of atomic elements might be possible, if the atomic nuclei can be caused to decay more readily.  More sinister applications might include new kinds of nuclear weapons, or even a disintegration ray that would cause atoms and molecules to simply fall apart.

Curiously, the discovery was originally made by Ephraim Fischbach, a researcher at Purdue, who was trying to use radioactive decay as a source of random numbers.  It was his investigation that led to the discovery that the rate of decay inexplicably varied over time.

 


      Comments [1]
tags: [atoms | physics | science]


Comments [0] posted: Jun 04, 2008 Greg O'Byrne


      Comments [0]
tags: [atoms | science | stars | supercollider]


Comments [3] posted: Sep 13, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Comparison of the very small and the very large.  Let's take a look at the empty space inside a hydrogen atom.

Do NOT grab the horizontal scroll tab, but click to the right in the scroll bar and see how far to the right the hypothetical electron resides in comparison to the proton...11 real world miles of scrolling supposedly, good luck.

...ok, once you get the idea grab the horizontal scroll tab.

...or go to the web page if you prefer: http://www.phrenopolis.com/perspective/atom/index.html

Now compare that to the cool planet and stars scale video...

I don't have anything else...I just thought it was cool

Look! Kittens!

kittens


      Comments [3]
tags: [atoms | kittens | nano | scale | space]


<<< Older Stuff Yo!
home | about | rss
heya punk.here is where lotsa content will be
Larry says!
Larry says!