Comments [0] posted: May 14, 2008 Greg O'Byrne

imageThe Microtransit Challenge.

This is a testament to Moore's law.

Ten years ago this was 100% science fiction.  Five years ago someone could talk about it.  2006 they held it on a lake.

This year its across the Atlantic.

...and it's at hobby prices.

One of the entrants, the Pinta, cost the competitors £2,500.  Umm...you could build it in your garage if you had the programming chops.

Big deal you say, it's just a glorified model sailboat.  Well yes and no.  Yes they look like simple little sailboats but they've got: Solar power, automated sensors, GPS positioning and course navigation software.  They obviously have a much simpler algorithm than the DARPA Grand Challenge cars, but still need to get from point A to point B.

Also this technology will be a boon to climate science.  At £2,500 a pop you can make hundreds and send them out into the oceans and go anywhere and report back anything you can imagine.  A mobile science buoy.

News Article: Pinta the robot sailing boat takes on Atlantic challenge


      Comments [0]
tags: [accelerating change | autonomous | DARPA | robot | sailing]

Comments [0] posted: Dec 04, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Nothing really new here but it is interesting that the mainstream press is picking up on this now.

In the Future, Smart People Will Let Cars Take Control

Stanford computer scientist Sebasian Thrun makes this prediction:

In five years he expects a car that could take over simple chores like breezing along an expressway, inching along in stop-and-go traffic, or parking in the lot at a mall or airport after dropping off the driver. In 20 years, Dr. Thrun figures half of new cars sold will offer drivers the option of turning over these chores to a computer

techRivet had a similar article earlier: Autonomous Cars will change urban living


      Comments [0]
tags: [accelerating change | automotive | autonomous | cars | DARPA | robot]

Comments [0] posted: Nov 09, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

image Follow along with my thinking here.

If autonomous cars become a viable technology, which I believe they will.

Then you can expect to be able to have the car "drive" you to work with little or no supervision.

Why then would you need your car to stay downtown or at your work after it drops you off?

You could send it home.

If a car is expected to provide door to door service and then return to its starting point, couldn't it then provide someone else with ridership service, doesn't that imply a few things about our urban centers.

Would we need as many parking lots?  Would we need ANY parking lots?

Do the new autonomous cars replace buses?  bikes? 

Routine Maintenance:
Think about this.  Your car needs routine maintenance.  It messages you on your handheld at work.  Providing suggestions for service locations automatically researched for price and quality.  You choose one and away your car goes. 

You come out after work and you car drives up, beeps its cute little horn, all happy like, you hop in and away you go.

No more School Bus:
You've got a group of families, several kids.  Who needs a school bus.  Hop in the car kids, it'll drop you off at school.  It wouldn't allow them to open the door until they were there.  It'd be safer than YOU driving them to school.

Change:
It becomes a tool, an extension of our reach, an appendage.  It CHANGES the relationship between a person and a car.


      Comments [0]
tags: [automotive | autonomous | DARPA | robot]

<<< Older Stuff Yo!
The 2007 Weblog Awards




Total Posts: 430
This Year: 173
This Month: 2
This Week: 2
Comments: 191


Tech blogs
Technology Blogs - Blog Top Sites Outpost

Sign In
home | about | rss
heya punk.here is where lotsa content will be
Larry says!
Larry says!