Comments [0] posted: May 10, 2008 Greg O'Byrne

Just type in a zip code number by number and watch it drive down to the specific location on the map. [linky]

Example: 90210

image


      Comments [0]
tags: [cool thing | interface | maps | zip code]

Comments [0] posted: May 06, 2008 Greg O'Byrne


      Comments [0]
tags: [cool thing | interface]

Comments [0] posted: Apr 28, 2008 Greg O'Byrne

Some of these might make me a convert.

http://www.blogkindle.com/archives/2008/02/kindle-v20/

image

I think I like this one the best.  Looks the right size, rotates view, can be opened, some interesting UI elements.  When can I get one?


      Comments [0]
tags: [amazon | books | interface | kindle | ui]

Comments [1] posted: Apr 14, 2008 Greg O'Byrne

imageIf you've ever played a first person shooter then you know that you can tell the good guys from the bad guys by the color of a little triangle (or circle or hexegon or whatever) floating over their head.

Well they are typically red and green.

What if you are colorblind, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart.  I believe game designers are remiss for not taking this into account for nearly 8% of all males have some form of color blindness.  Males being the larger demographic for gaming, I think there might be some benefit to pursuing some usability improvements in the use of color.

It wouldn't be hard, just make it a setting that the user can change.  Done and done.


      Comments [1]
tags: [gaming | interface | ui | vision]

Comments [0] posted: Jan 18, 2008 Greg O'Byrne

electricEye University of Washington.

Engineers at the UW have for the first time used manufacturing techniques at microscopic scales to combine a flexible, biologically safe contact lens with an imprinted electronic circuit and lights.

Go Huskies!

This is pretty cool...but I wore contacts for a long time and they suck!  Some people can wear them without any problems, my sister for one.  Me?...pain and suffering.

"Looking through a completed lens, you would see what the display is generating superimposed on the world outside," said Babak Parviz, a UW assistant professor of electrical engineering. "This is a very small step toward that goal, but I think it's extremely promising."

Pretty snazzy nonetheless.


      Comments [0]
tags: [display | eye | interface | vision]

Comments [0] posted: Dec 28, 2007 Eric Franklin

I've been lethargically trying to purchase a Wii for months now, without success. Apparently you have to be quite serious about hunting one down because they're sell out everywhere that they crop up. Amazon.com reported that when they had them in stock, they were selling 17 of them a second! If the technology in this clip starts to make it mainstream, we're going to continue to be constrained on these puppies. The clarity of the description of the technology, as well as the demonstration itself, is first rate.

Make sure to check out Johnny Lee's other Wiimote projects.



Comments [0] posted: Nov 21, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Paralyzed man's mind is 'read'

Eric Ramsay can only "speak" by moving his eyes.  Now scientists and doctors are on the verge of being able to interpret his brain signals as speach...

"We have been moving towards decoding primitive vocabulary for a while now. But this is certainly an interesting development, although invasive techniques, where something is out in someone's brain, such as these will of course carry risks."

This is remarkable.

The forefront of Brain Computer Interface.  This is not a completed interface but the doctors and scientists involved believe they are getting close.


      Comments [0]
tags: [BCI | brain | interface | invention | medicine | science]

Comments [0] posted: Nov 06, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Wow.

This is very impressive.  When can I get one for my XBox.

Mersive's homepage: http://www.mersive.com/


      Comments [0]
tags: [interface | virtual reality | youtube]

Comments [0] posted: Nov 04, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

imageThis is brilliant. 

Eye-Fi.

Here's how it works.

  1. You get the Eye-Fi card. 
  2. You plug the Eye-Fi SD card into your machine. 
  3. Onboard software initializes the SD card. 
  4. You put that card in your camera and you're done.

When you use it.

  1. Take pictures.
  2. The Eye-Fi card uploads the picture automatically to your computer.
    1. You don't  have to connect any wires
    2. you don't have to tell it
    3. no buttons
    4. it just does it
  3. You can also tell it to automatically upload those photos to an online photo account of your choosing.
  4. Sweet.

The only hitch is you need a wireless network.  I have Cat-5 all through my house so I would need to turn on my wireless router, but most people are wireless now I expect.

This is a brilliant implementation because it does not require you as a user to buy a new camera to get this automatic functionality.  All you need is to replace you SD card and you are good to go.

Great product design.


      Comments [0]
tags: [camera | innovation | interface | internet | invention | photography | wi-fi]

Comments [0] posted: Oct 11, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

BrainLightning Researchers at Tufts University are conducting research to enhance user interfaces depending on blood flow in your brain.  Essentially using the blood flow as a marker for how high your current stress level is and hopefully more targeted information.

This would then be used to modify the user interface you work with to improve it conditionally to your behavior.

The technology is called Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS).  Basically it involves taking a headband full of infrared lasers, putting it on your head and shooting your brain with said lasers...ummm, sounds worse than it is.

The fNIRS device, which looks like a futuristic headband, uses laser diodes to send near-infrared light through the forehead at a relatively shallow depth—only two to three centimeters—to interact with the brain’s frontal lobe. Light usually passes through the body’s tissues, except when it encounters oxygenated or deoxygenated hemoglobin in the blood. Light waves are absorbed by the active, blood-filled areas of the brain and any remaining light is diffusely reflected to the fNIRS detectors.

[linky]

This is an interesting angle of research.  Not looking directly at the brain activity but at the blood supply. 


      Comments [0]
tags: [BCI | interface | telepathy | wetware]

Comments [0] posted: Oct 04, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

BrainLightningThis segues nicely from the post I wrote yesterday: Will Wetware result in Telepathy?.

CNet News: [linky]

This is not necessarily a new invention but more of an INDUSTRY STANDARD.  This will hopefully allow for faster research in specific areas of brain computer interface.  Other researchers can focus on solving specific problems, they can use the MIT standard interface algorithm for the communication layer.

Fascinating.

MIT press release: [linky]

 Key point:

Until now, researchers working on brain prosthetics have used different algorithms depending on what method they were using to measure brain activity. The new model is applicable no matter what measurement technique is used, according to Srinivasan. "We don't need to reinvent a new paradigm for each modality or brain region," he said.

Journal of Neurophysiology, the research is due to be published in October: [linky]


      Comments [0]
tags: [BCI | brain | interface | MIT | wetware]

Comments [0] posted: Oct 03, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Wetware and you. How I learned to not fear silicon.

In a world where all our expectations are routinely exceeded I have the expectation that we will one day have comprehensive, multi-faceted, robust wetware. What I mean by wetware is portable, ubiquitous, virtually invisible brain computer interface [BCI].

Some of you out in the audience may scoff at this prediction on several grounds: it's only science fiction, it's too complex, the brain will never be understood to that degree, it's icky, who would be stupid enough to stick electronics in their brain.

My goal of this post is not to refute those arguments but to describe a potential outcome. I will only say that many things written about in science fiction years ago have come to pass, this could be another.

Capabilities. Google as my outer brain.

Among the many capabilities that I believe we will have at the tip of our mind will be the near instant access to all the information on the Internet. Think of it, we will be able to channel any and all the information, from any source in the world.

We will be able to view the world though enhanced sensations, what is called augmented reality. Visually directions might be placed over our world, a mobile heads up display as it were. We will have information provided to us about everyday objects, what they contain, how we might use them, are they helpful? Are they perhaps harmful?

Visual augmentation is already under research: eyetap.

And there is no reason why it only has to be visually enhanced. What you hear and feel and SMELL, could all be enhanced.

Will we still think in the same way if any and all information we want is at the wish of our brain? The power of memory will at least decrease as it will be unnecessary to remember anything. Already we see this occurring with handsets controlling peoples phone books. How many phone numbers do you know? How many phone numbers did your parents know?

The result will be far reaching and certainly a mixed bag of good and bad.

Personas. Part of you for everyone to see.

We will expose a part of our thinking and wishing to the outside world. This will be in some form of a persona or perhaps a simplistic statistic sheet. It will probably take many forms and there will likely need to be some sort of consortium that will establish industry standards...and Microsoft will probably create a competing standard that will in many ways be better but in some ways crippled.

This exposed persona or avatar or datasheet or "comic-bubble" will be a form of interface with other people. It will let them see who we are, what we are looking for, maybe what we are feeling, what we think about them.

And we will be able to see the avatar of others.

For all intents and purposes...Telepathy.

If we can see thoughts and feelings of others and they can see the same from us...isn't that the definition of telepathy?

[Definition: Telepathy...is a term used to describe the transfer of information on thoughts or feelings between individuals by means other than the five classical senses. Wikipedia]

I guess it isn't quite the historical fantasy of reading someone's mind, but in a way the reverse. Our mind (or a small portion of it) is exposed externally for the viewing.

What sort of interface will there be? Will our software mind automatically attach with another persona and exchange information? Or will it be a passive listening/watching interface? Will we be able to attach to more than one person? What sort of new crimes will be created from this technology? How do you define your personal space in this new world?

I of course have no answers to those questions? Merely more questions?

Will we end up hating EVERYBODY?

With regards to human interaction, we could see a greater polarization within the public much like we've seen in media consumption as the Internet has matured. With our viewpoints and emotions harder to hide and more on our sleeves as it were, people might tend to automatically gravitate towards only people of similar thinking as themselves.

This could hurt friendships as people have a more difficult time accepting people when some of their disparate thoughts and feelings are on display for the world to see.

How do you hide your politics, your religious feelings, your bigotry, your distaste? Because we all do right now. The bottling up inside our heads of all our unorganized and contradictory thoughts and feelings allows us to deal with everyone around us in a civilized manner. What if you can no longer edit your thoughts and feelings from the outside world?

There of course will need to be a way to prevent the display of all your inner most thoughts. I assume there will be differing levels of display. In public you show the bare minimum: first name [or handle], occupation, public contact info...and nada mucho.

With friends and family you would show more. Perhaps much more. It would bring a whole new meaning to the word homepage.

There would grow up around the exposed persona a whole range and breadth of supporting applications. This is a brand new market for software development that has no entrants in it yet.

Software that you can create and make billions off of

Filter programs: An easy means of controlling what is exposed to whom. This software package will probably be included with the original installation, but after market suites will probably have a niche to fill as well.

Spoofers: Do you want someone to think you like them but your true feelings get in the way? An emotion spoofer is perfect for this. Politicians will absolutely require this mind-mod.

Detectors: Do you want to know if someone is spoofing you? With the emotion spoofer detection application, you may not be able to find out what they truly think, but you will know if they are lying about it.

Environment overlay: Does your city look dull and gray? Get this package and make all the buildings rosy and pink. Hide the garbage, dull the stink. Change the settings to suit your tastes

Adware: Ah yes there will be money in them thar hills. Every new medium is followed by advertising. Why should this be any different. As you walk through the world targeted visitor ads will be displayed at any opportunity, trying to entice you to spend your hard earned money.

Ad-blocking software: With adware comes ad blocking software. They are two peas in a pod.

Who will build it?

Who will write the software?

What will the OS look like?

Will it be Linux or Windows?

Of course if its inside my brain I will probably want a Mac.


      Comments [0]
tags: [future | interface | software | telepathy | wetware]

Comments [1] posted: Sep 20, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Flash tried for a long time to become the next paradigm in web User Interface design. Over the years there has been loud supporters of Flash technologies in support of this effort. But there has been a larger resistance.

It has failed up to now largely because Flash adds only marginal benefit over HTML and it brakes standard navigation from within a browser. For any added snazziness that Flash provided you got little else along with it. The net was negative.

It has always had a place as a online game platform or as an online rich "creative" [read advertisement] platform. But not as a replacement UI.

But it did accomplish something. It got a high penetration rate: 97% plus.

This has been a crucial factor in its adoption as the now defacto web-video standard. None of the other players whether they be quicktime or windows media player have that adoption rate. Flash allows near ubiquity in one format. This presents the only way currently for unifying a customer experience when viewing a video.

The other benefit that I believe has not been written about as of yet is that with Flash you can design your own player. This is great for any site concerned about their brand, especially for video sharing sites like Revver and of course YouTube. For if someone puts a video from your site on their blog, you can deliver that video from within a branded Flash player. Even to the point of providing some unique navigation elements.

Your brand is proliferated beyond the domain of your site...virally. 

Questions pop into my brain at this point.

Will this be the flash legacy? Will we look back on Flash in 5 years and perceive it primarily as a video delivery technology and not as a game/creative/vector-graphic engine?

I say yes. The benefits it provides to the online delivery of videos cannot be matched by any of the other technologies currently available.It provides ubiquity, customization, easy maintenance, easy share-ability...check, check, check, check.

It is not the first mover in this space, in fact it is quite late to the party, but it has the above stated benefits that provide differentiation that are, in my humble opinion, not beatable by the current set of substitute products.

Will it be able to leverage this capability into a broader control of the web UI space?

Ahh, now this is an interesting question. Flash is in an interesting place. It is almost like it stumbled into this position. It is on the verge of LOCKING up this channel of content delivery. What happens then? Once people are comfortable with pasting an <embed> or an <object> tag on their page, what can flash leverage beyond that...?

Maybe they'll achieve their goal of becoming the Web UI via this route instead of head on. We shall have to wait and see.


      Comments [1]
tags: [flash | interface | Revver | ui | video | youtube]

Comments [0] posted: Jul 24, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

So I love the Stumble Upon toolbar. I like it as a user, it can be a real time suck. I like it as a blog owner because it can drive traffic like nothing else I've ever encountered. It is simple, easy to comprehend and just plain fun.

I was curious as to what other competitors might be out there. And I found a few.

Stumble Upon toolbar - http://www.stumbleupon.com/

The market leader. They have a well designed toolbar, website and backend system. The sites can be rated with a simple thumbs up or thumbs down button. Lots of additional features but they are all superfluous. The only thing that matters is that you can submit a site easily, rate a site easily and view a random site at the click of a button. Simplicity drives the success of this toolbar.

Streakr - discorveryBar - http://www.streakr.com/

A direct competitor to the stumble upon toolbar. The one problem I have with it in comparison to StumbleUpon is the handling of categories. SU allows you to choose a subset of categories from which to return a site. Streakr lets you choose All categories or One category. Neither one of those choices is exactly what I want. A bit nitpicky of me I think.

The Random Site toolbar - http://therandomsite.ourtoolbar.com/

Bills itself in the same space but it is not quite as good. It pulls you back to TheRandomSite.com with a featured content link. It is also slower than stumble upon. This is a sub-optimal solution and we should not pursue this technique.

Google random site button - http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-04-18-n70.html


This random button is a secondary install for the google toolbar. It returns a random site based on your previous search history. The returned sites don’t seem to be as interesting as an anecdotal review.


      Comments [0]
tags: [cool thing | google | interface | internet | stumble upon]

Comments [0] posted: Jul 23, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

techRivet.com has been trying to stay on top of the whole Brain Computer Interface [BCI] technologies for awhile now. [here] We've even talked about NeuroSky themselves and their almost-ready-for-consumer BCI unit.

Now we can see it in action

The games look somewhat basic at the moment, but give it time. If it is anything like the Wii controller and how fast people are adapting and mod-ing its uses...well it might be an interesting phase of computer interface development coming up.



Comments [1] posted: Jul 11, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

I mean what is apple gonna do...sue em?

These are the two companies that get a pass, neither one can do any evil or bad thing. So what happens when one steps on the toes of the other...

BTW this is yet another example of google's attempts to put everyone else out of business.


      Comments [1]
tags: [apple | google | interface | iPod]

Comments [3] posted: Jun 06, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Is there a cooler conference to attend than TED?  I gotta get there one of these days.

Semantic connections between pictures.  All the pictures online interconnected.  Your picture that you upload could immediately get enriched with all the data, images, information, perspective, beauty...everything of all the other pictures of the same place.

Truly incredible.

Go here to try it FOR YOURSELF! [photosynth]

This technology along with the recently released surface from Microsoft sure makes me wonder if the king is truly dead.  It sure doesn't look like it to me.


      Comments [3]
tags: [cool thing | future | interface | Microsoft]

Comments [2] posted: Jun 05, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

This is fascinating. Using the tongue as the interface with the brain for Brain Computer Interface (BCI). Cool idea.

Lotsa nerve endings, very sensitive, can discern pixels up to 64k...with some training this could be very interesting. And if they can work with the taste buds you could flavor colors...

a growing body of research indicates that the tongue may in fact be the second-best place on the body for receiving visual information from the world and transmitting it to the brain.

[linky]


      Comments [2]
tags: [brain | interface | wetware]

Comments [0] posted: Jun 04, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Joel Spolsky has a couple of very interesting posts about elevator usbiilty: [linky 1], [linky 2].

The second link brings up an interesting usability bug around users being forced to use two different elevator interfaces, one for work and one for home.

I couldn't resist telling you the second usability bug with those elevators where you select a floor before getting on. People who work in buildings with the new elevators but live in buildings with traditional elevators report that when they get home at night, they sometimes get into the elevator and then just stand there, expecting the elevator to know their floor already.

Now I think something that's much more relevant to everyone reading this is the difference between the automated faucets in public bathrooms and old school ones with handles.

Do you ever find yourself sliding your hands under a faucet and waiting...waiting...eh, oh it's got a handle.  Cause I do.

Very interesting how quickly automated faucets integrated themselves into our environment and expectations.


      Comments [0]
tags: [design | human | interface]

Comments [0] posted: May 30, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

techRivet.com has posted several articles on new interfaces focusing on the new multi-touch technologies: [here's the list]

And now the godzilla has entered the market. Microsoft: Surface.

Double Secret Probation

In all the speculation that the computer is leaving the desktop and migrating to the web. And with all the hype around how Google is positioned better for the future with its business based in the web app market. And with how Microsoft has struggled to move in that direction to head off Google. Along comes this

This is right up Microsofts forte'. It exposes the weakness in Googles business plan. If...and it is a big if...the desktop does not move to the web, but instead moves to an integration-within-our-environment application...well who is in the catbird seat now?

But then I guess Google could just buy out Perceptive Pixel and all that would be solved for them. Right?

Surprise turns to outright astonishment

It is also astonishing in two respects.

  1. How under wraps Microsoft has kept this
  2. How their timing appears to be very good in this space (unlike many others recently)

Technology continues apace. We have NO IDEA what we will be doing with it in 5 years time. This is only a glimpse into the future

...and Ray Kurzweil continues to say I told you so


      Comments [0]
tags: [cool thing | innovation | interface | Microsoft]

Comments [0] posted: May 22, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Jeff Han and his company, Perceptive Pixel, are ground breakers in the development of new interfaces. techRivet has documented the multi-touch display before: here and here and here

Here is a website that is keeping track of the multi-touch technologies and Perceptive Pixel in particular: The Multi touch screen

I'm gonna keep track of that one - like many things there is no new information there really.  The only nugget is that Jeff Han was NOT hired by Apple to work on the iPhone.


      Comments [0]
tags: [interface | invention]

Comments [0] posted: May 18, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

There are a lot of people doing a lot of experimenting with new interfaces. Here is an example of a photo manipulation table that looks pretty intriguing.

Related links:



Comments [0] posted: May 17, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

So I've talked about World Wind, [linky] which comes with an interface for several planets and the moon.  Well now Google has gotten into the act and created a moon map. [linky]

Google goes one better by highlighting the locations of the moon landings.


      Comments [0]
tags: [google | interface | science | space]

Comments [0] posted: May 01, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

techRivet has published more than a few articles about new user interfaces [linky], one of them dealing specifically with Brain Computer Interfaces [BCI]. But here is a company that is actually in the process of bringing BCI to market.

NeuroSky has developed a cost effective bio sensor and signal processing system for the consumer market. Our wearable technology unlocks worlds of new applications such as consumer electronics, health, wellness, education and training.

This is still vapor ware but there is some degree of non-hype to it

Yang is secretive about his company's product lineup because of a non-disclosure agreement with the manufacturer. But he said an international toy manufacturer plans to unveil an inexpensive gizmo with an embedded NeuroSky biosensor at the Japan Toy Association's trade show in late June. A U.S. version is scheduled to debut at the American International Fall Toy Show in October. - USA Today

Cool. Not wetware, but still BCI. If they are able to actual deliver this to market...well we'll just have to wait and see.

This is kinda the opposite of the Morse Code beats SMS interface article from a week ago. This might be snappy new technology, but will its performance surpass the current keyboard/mouse/screen UI? Because that is the most successful / fastest / lowest-barrier-to-learn interface so far developed.

Verdict: cool as a margarita on hot summer day...but I'm gonna wait for version 2.0.

hat tip: Sci Fi Tech


      Comments [0]
tags: [hype | innovation | interface | wetware]

Comments [3] posted: Apr 21, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

I think a lot of people have seen this:

And it certainly has been written about at length, even over at oreillynet.com. So what do I have to add to the conversation. Well I'd like to talk about how this can be viewed through the lense of good user interface designs and the decisions you make when creating a new one.

Your Opinion Is Irrelevant

The young lady's opinion at the begining of the video is a perfect illustration of bias. Essentially it illustrates one of the great product management mantras, "Your opinion is interesting but irrelevent." By the end of the video clip you find out that her initial opinion was completely false.

Get the data before you make any decisions.

Morse code is a great illustration of a design choice. Here we have a method that speeds up the transmission of text across the wire (or wireless).  The choice is around user education.  Current phone texting takes virtually zero training, morse code takes more.

Even if Morse code is A LOT faster, in a cost benefit analysis it still probably makes sense to use the current standard UI.  Although it might be interesting for some phone manufacturer to try it out.  For some reason it sounds right up Blackberry's aisle to me...

Links:
Pocket Morse 1.3
Morse Coder 1.7

Update: Well hopefully the replaced video will stay live for a bit. But nevertheless I did find something else that is interesting during my search for a replacement. Check out this:

Notice the keybooad sitting next to it? It's our old friend Steampunk Keyboard Dude, better known as Jake. Check out the project page: telegraph


      Comments [3]
tags: [design | interface | pdm | product]

Comments [2] posted: Apr 11, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

What if you paired this:

With this:

Do you grok?


      Comments [2]
tags: [innovation | interface | convergence | security]

Comments [0] posted: Apr 09, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

I have read science fiction since before I could grok and one of the most common "future" technologies used in the stories has been wetware: brain implants. William Gibson pushed the concept far into the mainstream with his cyberpunk novels such as Neuromancer and Count Zero. The Matrix movies took it to an extreme. But that is all fiction, what is reality?

2002

I read an article in wired way back in 2002 [linky - Vision Quest] that talked about curing blindness through wetware.  It described a brain implant technology being developed at UCLA and other locations that put a diode under the patient's skull adjacent to their visual center of the brain and cured (partially, and with side effects) their blindness.

True wetware.

The side effects of seizures not-withstanding, this was an incredible breakthrough.

But where are we today?

BCI - circa 2007

Brain Computer Interfaces [BCI] is the official name given to this discipline and there is a lot of progress.

Check out this video from Berlin:

Now that isn't wetware, but it is BCI.

Brain implants are going to help quadriplegics

And if you have any doubt as to the applicability of such technology check out this video:

Now THAT is wetware, but it is only a first step.

Here is an article about the volunteer in the above video. Wired 2005 [linky - Mind Control]

Nagle, 25, is the first patient in a controversial clinical trial that seeks to prove brain-computer interfaces can return function to people paralyzed by injury or disease.
Impressive. But the current size of the equipment "...refrigerator-sized cart of electronic gear." will need to be shrunk down, but you know how that goes. Give it a few years.

Convergence

We have convergence happening here as well. DARPA has initiated an effort to create breakthrough prosthetic limbs [linky]. Limbs that are radically better, have actual touch and feel and human reflexes. The example I've heard it explained like is Luke Skywalker's replacement hand at the end of Empire Strikes Back.

We are on the verge of true Cyborg technologies here. And at the speed at which the discoveries are being made, how fast scientists and engineers were able to improve year over year in the last DARPA challenge [linky - driverless cars], we could be in for quite a rollercoaster.

So we have breakthroughs coming in BCI, breakthroughs in prosthetics and breakthroughs coming in vision and hearing sensors. All of this is converging rapidly. You don't hear much about it, but we are going to wake up in just 5 or 10 years with capabilities far exceeding what we have today.

The Future

In the future will we all be hooked together into a World Wide Mind? In the video below some of the leading futurists talk about what might be in store of us. I don't hear much cautionary discussion coming from them. They speak of the benefits of the World Wide Mind, what about the drawbacks?

  • the obliteration of privacy
  • the potential for predators to abuse the technology
  • the threat of a computer virus to physically harm people
  • electrocution
  • dependence on external power and support for your survival
  • weather (lightning)
  • more...
But anyways all that being said it still might be a net benefit.

Yet one more example of accelerating change.

We think things are not changing because we are unable to see them in the context of time. Humans live in the present. If we were to back up to 1990 and view the current state of this field of research it would look incredible. And yet here, with us being so close to it all, we don't see it, we don't talk about it, we accept it as the norm.

It is not the norm. It is revolutionary.

The crippled will walk and the blind will see.

References:

Wikipedia:
Brain Implants - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_implant

Seeing what a cat sees:
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/6/20/111815/063

bionic eye
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6368089.stm
http://www.medgadget.com/archives/2007/01/second_sight_me.html

Retina implant
http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=bionic-eye.htm&url=http://www.optobionics.com/home.asp

Department of Biomedical Engineering at USC is working on a variety of different projects including retina implants, not quite true wetware  but related.[linky]


      Comments [0]
tags: [accellerating returns | future | human | interface | wetware]

Comments [0] posted: Apr 06, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

So what happens when you take the click out of the interface.  Go over here and try it out.  Fascinating experience.

It raises some thoughts for me.

  1. Why remove the click in the first place.  I mean it's a ubiquitous, trivial user interface that works. 
  2. Removing the click removes the use of our fingers from the device.  You now are limited to your hand and arm...isn't that a downgrade?
  3. A lot of the questions and work that went into this site seems devoted to making the non-click interface as easy to use as the click...uh...just keep the click.
  4. My subconcious wanted to click SOOOOOOO bad during portions of the experiment it was kinda weird.

Go check it out it's pretty interestingg.


      Comments [0]
tags: [experiment | flash | interface]

Comments [2] posted: Apr 02, 2007 Greg O'Byrne

Talk about amazement...

Here is a presentation of the multi-touch interface from Eric's post: new user interfaces

Straight out of "Minority Report"

As soon as Best Buy has it in stock, I'm buying it.


      Comments [2]
tags: [cool thing | interface | invention]